Of course it's in a letter that probably itself is pseudonymous.
I tend to group all three of them together as being probably by the same author and all being pseudonymous.
In my mind I'm thinking okay if you want to write a pseudonymous letter and claim to be Paul, how do you make it convincing?
They don't tell us who their author is. Notice, they're not pseudonymous.
Eliot's first full-length novel, and the work which made her (pseudonymous) name as Victorian fiction's leading novelist of ideas.
The weird thing about Revelation,though, is that it's pseudonymous.
They tend to be pseudonymous, and they are set deep in the past like we saw in the book of Daniel.
Sometimes if you're writing a pseudonymous letter you'll put a reference saying, well now some people have been circulating pseudonymous letters by me and I condemn them for it.
What most scholars think is that this pseudonymous, you won't be surprised now to know that we don't think the brother of Jesus or the brother of James actually wrote this text.
What else about the letters that you heard might tip you off that they're pseudonymous? Yes sir.
