Moonlight passing 47.77% of the Silverlight 4 test suite.
This feature is found in the test client and test suite editors.
Method for generating test suite based on user-defined faults in EFSM model
Because there are performance costs of recreating the DOM for every test function in a test suite.
Code without a good test suite is typically buggy, hard to change with confidence, and poorly factored.
Visualize your test suite sorted into three layers, each layer representing a different type of developer test defined by how long it takes to run.
Suppose you create a test suite that includes a case that expects the document in Listing 1 as a correct output.
If the verdict from the test suite doesn't really tell you about the quality of the project, you're just wasting time and resources.
In that case, even if you run your purified program through an automated test suite; when an error occurs, it will dump extra messages into the Purify log that will help you identify the problem.
A test suite may contain redundant test cases.
We’re splitting our test suite into public and private tests.
In particular, look for issues in the test suite that don't arise in normal code.
Last, to make this test suite repeatable, it would be nice to not make any assumptions regarding data integrity.
We repeat the test suite for each of our storage layers. Again we rerun those test cases 2 times: once to test Transaction Log recovery and then to test Regular Shutdown.
As a valuable side effect, you end up with a test suite that can help prevent the introduction of regressions when you maintain the code.
Everything was fine until about a year ago, when your test suite eclipsed 2,000 tests and people started noticing that the build process was taking more than three hours to run.
You need a good test suite watching your back.
In addition to this automated regression test suite we also do extensive manual testing as well.
While theory insists that working with only one test suite is possible, this is unmanageable in practice.
If the resulting code duplication offends your sense of style, try splitting the test suite into smaller, more modular classes, in each of which all initial data is Shared among all test methods.
A test suite architecture centered around decision points
Then go nuts: smoke tests, any acceptance test suite you have, and of course regression and exploratory testing.
The alliance maintains an open source reference implementation and test suite for various technologies relevant to OpenAjax Metadata 1.0. At this writing, the open source project provides.
General information includes the name, description, and relative file path of the test suite.
The test suite is designed with a UML activity diagram, in which each action corresponds to a test action (test script) and each decision corresponds to a decision script, as shown in Figure 10.
The test suite structure should correspond to this next phase, as well as the quality results.
We have three tests in our test suite for this article, one for each operation in the API; the contents of these tests is shown in Figure 1 below.
Each successive run of the test suite will add a new row at the beginning of the table.
The test suite is great for helping to ensure that functionality doesn’t get regressed as the API is developed and is also a handy way to validate interoperability in a repeatable way.
